Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Logseq VS Foam

Compare Logseq VS Foam and see what are their differences

Logseq logo Logseq

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.

Foam logo Foam

Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub
  • Logseq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-10-15
  • Foam Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-06-28

Logseq features and specs

  • Bidirectional Linking
    Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
  • Graph View
    The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
  • Markdown Support
    Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
  • Local Storage
    Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
  • Task Management
    Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Logseq

  • Learning Curve
    New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
  • Sync Complexity
    While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
  • Resource Intensive
    Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
  • Community Dependency
    As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
  • Customization Complexity
    While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.

Foam features and specs

  • Open Source
    Foam is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and allows for community-driven development and contributions. Users can modify the source code to fit their specific needs.
  • Markdown Support
    Foam uses Markdown, a lightweight and easy-to-read syntax, making it simple to create and manage notes. This also allows for easy integration with other Markdown-based tools and platforms.
  • Integration with Visual Studio Code
    Foam is designed to work seamlessly with Visual Studio Code (VS Code). This provides users with a powerful and familiar text editor environment, complete with extensions and customization options.
  • Graph View
    Foam includes a graph visualization feature that helps users see and navigate the relationships between their notes, making it easier to understand and manage complex information.
  • Bidirectional Links
    Foam supports bidirectional links, allowing users to create connections between notes in both directions. This enhances the note-taking experience by enabling a more interconnected and dynamic information structure.
  • Community and Documentation
    Foam has a growing community of users and contributors, as well as comprehensive documentation. This support network helps users troubleshoot issues, share tips, and improve their knowledge of the tool.

Possible disadvantages of Foam

  • Limited to VS Code
    Foam relies on Visual Studio Code as its primary environment. Users who prefer different text editors or platforms might find this limitation restrictive and less convenient.
  • Learning Curve
    Although Foam leverages Markdown, users may still face a learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with VS Code or the specific features and extensions required to maximize Foam's capabilities.
  • Performance with Large Datasets
    Foam can struggle with performance issues when handling large datasets or a high number of notes. This can lead to slow response times and inefficient workflows.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Foam is primarily designed for desktop use within VS Code, which means that mobile support is limited. Users looking for a seamless cross-platform experience might find this aspect lacking.
  • Customization Complexity
    While Foam offers a high degree of customization, setting up and configuring the tool to meet personal preferences and workflows can be complex and time-consuming for some users.

Logseq videos

Logseq - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal

More videos:

  • Review - How I use Logseq Daily - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal
  • Review - Logseq Update Video - A Roam Research Alternative for Notes / PKM / To Do / Journal

Foam videos

These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review

More videos:

  • Review - Arrowzoom Foam Review
  • Review - Ryobi Foam Blaster VS. Amazon Foam Cannon | Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Logseq and Foam)
Note Taking
80 80%
20% 20
Knowledge Management
85 85%
15% 15
Knowledge Base
71 71%
29% 29
Personal Notes
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Logseq and Foam. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Logseq and Foam

Logseq Reviews

The 5 Best Open Source Miro Alternatives in 2024
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can do with the tool, and highlight its strengths and weaknesses compared to Miro, another popular tool in the note-taking and organization space.
Source: affine.pro
Supercharge Your Productivity: Three Recommended Tools for Thought
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Source: medium.com
Logseq vs Roam Research vs Obsidian: which one should you choose?
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out and look daunting. Logseq wins this round for me, hands down. – The only reason to choose Obsidian’s user interface over Logseq’s is that the former is far more...
Source: medium.com
Best 5 Obsidian Alternatives
Logseq is an open-source outliner application that makes it easy to write, organize and share your thoughts and to-do lists thanks to the ability to create and edit plain-text Markdown and Org-mode files. This means that your data is locally stored and yours forever and that it can be edited with any tools supporting those formats.
Obsidian vs. Roam vs. LogSeq: Which PKM App is Right For You?
While LogSeq and Roam function very similarly, LogSeq isn’t quite as refined. There’s a lot of thought that went into Roam’s simple interface, and while we appreciate that LogSeq is trying to push things forward in specific areas (like the addition of a Journals page), it doesn’t feel quite as smooth.

Foam Reviews

We have no reviews of Foam yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Logseq should be more popular than Foam. It has been mentiond 290 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Logseq mentions (290)

View more

Foam mentions (48)

  • Migrating from DokuWiki to Obsidian
    I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself https://foambubble.github.io/foam/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • I Use Obsidian
    I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown, so I can easily do without it—it provides the absolute bare minimum for easy linking of notes without proprietary markup). - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Use a Work Journal to Recover Focus Faster and Clarify Your Thoughts
    If you're interested in an open-source, free equivalent, check out VSCodium (open-source version of VSCode), and FOAM (VSCode plugin - https://foambubble.github.io/foam/). In a new project, create a `docs/` folder, and start with `docs/notes.md`. When you want to branch out to other files & links, you can type [[MyTopic]] and FOAM will automatically create MyTopic.md, and will allow you to click on the link and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Vscode setup with Foam and Logseq for Digital Note Taking
    Source: (1) A personal knowledge management and sharing system for VSCode - Foam. https://foambubble.github.io/foam/. (2) A personal knowledge management and sharing system for VSCode. https://github.com/foambubble/foam. (3) Loam - Visual Studio Marketplace. https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ciceroisback.loam. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Request: VSCode extension that allows users to edit .cavas files
    Foam[0], memo[1], Markdown Memo[2], md-graph[3] file/directory display plugin [4] ----- misc related links: https://forum.obsidian.md/t/obsidian-vscode-editor-elevate-your-code-editing-experience-in-obsidian/69057/2 https://forum.obsidian.md/t/vs-code-plugin-the-best-of-both-worlds/6358 https://jukkaniiranen.com/2022/01/canvas-app-source-code-editing-with-vs-code-in-your-browser/... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Logseq and Foam, you can also consider the following products

Obsidian.md - A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.

Notion - All-in-one workspace. One tool for your whole team. Write, plan, and get organized.

Roam Research - A note-taking tool for networked thought

Joplin - Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.

Nuclino - Nuclino works like a collective brain, helping teams bring all their knowledge, docs, and projects together in one place. It's a modern, simple, and blazingly fast way to collaborate.

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

OSZAR »